Our Interview With Dr. Stephanie Wideman, Associate Professor, Chair of Department, and Former and Interim Director of the UIndy Speech & Debate Team

By the Juris Education Interview Team

Dr. Stephanie Wideman is the Associate Professor, Chair of the Department of Communication, and Former and Interim Director of the UIndy Speech & Debate Team at the University of Indianapolis. 

1. What types of debates or formats does your union participate in?

We operate through a guiding philosophy that speech and debate events complement each other. We choose to participate in IPDA debate as it is the most audience-centered form of debate. It is also a more accessible form of debate to students that are also doing speech events.

2. What are some of the biggest takeaways or real-world benefits that students gain from participating in your debate union?

Debate offers an intense educational experience in argument analysis. Students become well versed in argument fallacies as well as public speaking skills. Personally, my experience in debate education as a competitor gave me the ability to process and analyze information very quickly. I also want to note that this type of education is particularly impactful for students that might be studying subjects outside of communication. We have graduated a number of successful medical doctors, lawyers, and public policy experts. The experience of competing on a speech and debate team has proved a very valuable asset in medical school, law school, and graduate admissions.

3. What’s the most challenging and the most rewarding aspect of joining a debate union?

For many, the most challenging aspect is public speaking. However, that challenge quickly turns into a rewarding experience as students learn that it is okay to not be perfect. This is a process that we continually reflect on and refine for students.

4. How does debating help students become more confident speakers?

The challenge of public speaking quickly turns into a rewarding experience as students learn that it is okay to not be perfect. This is a process that we continually reflect on and refine, helping students grow more confident and effective each time they speak.

5. Do you know of any former members of your debate union who have successfully gone on to law school? If so, how did their debate experience contribute to their success?

Yes! In my nearly twenty years of debate education, I have coached too many law students to count. This type of education goes beyond just knowing the law or field processes; it teaches students to challenge the status quo and focus on what can be. 

6. What advice would you give to aspiring law students who are considering joining a debate union in college but aren’t sure if it’s the right fit for them?

Do it! You don’t have to be naturally good at the activity. We teach you. Make the move and learn about a process that is fundamental to our democratic process. You have a voice; let us teach you how to use it!

‍Juris Education is proud to interview experts like Dr. Stephanie Wideman to help future lawyers understand the benefits of extracurricular involvement in college. Learn more about how our experts can help you get into law school today.

‍